Why critique research

Any limitations of the study, including bias, should be clearly presented. You will need to evaluate whether the author has clearly interpreted the results of the study, or whether the results could be interpreted another way. These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size.

There may also be recommendations for further research. These should be relevant to the study, be up to date, and should provide a comprehensive list of citations within the text. Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace. Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by existing literature.

This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: Verify here. Log In Join Ausmed. Start my Subscription. Log In. Sign Up. Press ESC to cancel. Skip to content Home Research Paper Why is critique research important? Research Paper. Ben Davis June 1, Why is critique research important? What is the importance of critique? Why is it important for a researcher to have healthy criticism? How do you start a research critique? Critiquing frameworks enable readers to make a judgement regarding the soundness of the research.

While it is possible to critique a piece of research without them, frameworks serve as useful aides-memoires for those who are not used to critiquing research. Many of the issues affecting quantitative research reported in the second article in this series Lee, b also apply to qualitative research, such as restrictions on word limits. This makes it important for readers to examine author guidelines for the particular journal. It is clearly not possible to cover every aspect of a study in a journal report.

Readers should therefore be careful before boldly stating that a researcher did not consider a certain aspect, since it may have been discussed at length in the original unpublished research report.

By reading the author guidelines of professional journals readers are better able to determine what authors can include and therefore by implication exclude , and then relate this to the critiquing framework outlined above. The terminology used in some professional journals would require inexperienced readers to explore meanings further.

Once data analysis has been completed, then qualitative researchers discuss their findings, although generalisability is not normally possible with qualitative research. Nursing journals have different expectations regarding how much discussion should be included regarding the trustworthiness of qualitative research. In fact not all qualitative researchers report these ideas in the same way - some use the notion of trustworthiness, whereas others use the terms validity and reliability, which are actually related more to quantitative research.

Finally, readers should consider implications of the research for nursing and midwifery. While these implications can relate to the practice, education, research and management of nursing and midwifery, not all research reports detail the implications for all aspects of the professions.

Indeed, the word allowance in many health journals will only allow for detailed discussion of a few implications. Careful examination of qualitative research gives practitioners a better understanding of how a group of people view or understand a particular situation. It can therefore enable individual practitioners to enhance their practice and contribute to evidence-based practice.

The development of such skills should assist pre-registration students with relevant assignments. Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed? Are recommendations for future action made? Are the suggestions for future action based on practical significance or on statistical.

Are recommendations for future research made? Additional general questions to be answered in your critique. What is are the research question s or hypothesis? Describe the sample used in this study. Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used. What type of research is this? How was the data analyzed? What is are the major finding s? A guide for critique of research articles Following is the list of criteria to evaluate critique a research article. Hint The following list is a guide for you to organize your evaluation.

Introduction Problem 1. Review of Related Literature 1. Hypotheses 1. Method Subjects 1. Instruments 1. Design and Procedure 1. Results 1. If parametric tests were used, is there evidence that the researcher avoided violating the required assumptions for parametric tests? Are the tests of significance described appropriate, given the hypotheses and design of the study?