What is scandal catholic

Yet Christ specifically mentions that this deed was good and even calls it a "beautiful thing" elsewhere. So it sometimes happen that the wicked, because of the "lack of rectitude", can be passively scandalized by a deed that they ought to rejoice in, as did Judas, or the Pharisees when they witnessed Christ heal on the Sabbath.

In these cases, those who are passively scandalized commit sin, because they "call good evil and evil good" while those who give the offense are innocent; in fact, they are especially blessed if their good deed brings down the wrath of the wicked - "blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake" [6]. In these situations, it is not a sin that gives rise to the scandal, but the lack of rectitude or right judgment on the part of the wicked.

Thomas distinguishes between active and passive scandal based on the distinction between the one committing the scandalizing act and the one who is scandalized by the deed. Catholic moral tradition further distinguishes three types of active scandal. Various moral theologians have opined on where the dividing lines are between these types, whether one is worse than another, etc.

We will here use the distinctions and definitions found in the classic moral theology textbook Moral Theology by John McHugh, O. Say a teenager steals, and his younger brother is taught to steal. Both are guilty of the sin of theft, but the older brother is guilty of the sins of theft and scandal. This is "scandal in itself. This is the case explained by St. Paul explains in 1 Cor. Let us review this passage in its entirety:. Do not seek your own advantage, but that of the other.

If I partake with thankfulness, why should I be denounced because of that for which I give thanks? So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do everything for the glory of God. Give no offense to Jews or to Greeks or to the church of God, just as I try to please everyone in everything I do, not seeking my own advantage, but that of many, so that they may be saved.

In this case, the act of buying and eating meat sacrificed to idols is not wrong in itself, because "an idol is nothing", as St. Paul says elsewhere. The first person can thus truly scandalize the second person by an act that is in itself good, but unlike the examples cited above with Judas, it is not due to the second person's wickedness, but only to their lack of formation or ignorance.

Note that the objective good of the first act eating meat is very small in comparison to the evil effect the potential loss of faith and salvation by the one who is scandalized. This is why St. Paul teaches that, in these circumstances, it is the stronger Christian who is to alter his behavior and give deference to the lesser; this is an example of the strong bearing with the weak, for why should a weaker Christian perhaps lose their faith over something as trivial as the eating of meat?

Those who commit "scandal of the little ones" are guilty of sin to the degree that they know their behavior could scandalize a weaker brother and do it anyway; a person who is not aware that a certain act that is in itself good or neutral is scandalizing someone else cannot be held to be guilty of this, however. The acting agent does have a moral responsibility to evaluate their actions, examine their conscience, and intentionally strive to avoid acts that, even if in themselves good, may scandalize others.

Sign up to the Weekly Round-Up eNewsletter now to receive headlines directly in your email. The Catholic Leader is an Australian award-winning Catholic newspaper that has been published by the Archdiocese of Brisbane since Our journalism seeks to provide a full, accurate and balanced Catholic perspective of local, national and international news while upholding the dignity of the human person.

The Catholic Leader acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the First Peoples of this country and especially acknowledge the traditional owners on whose lands we live and work throughout the Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane. Home Features Evangelisation. What is scandal? Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. By Fr John Flader I have been confused for quite some time as to exactly what scandal is and whether it is a sin. Related Stories. Ministry to married couples must change to save marriage, author urges.

Share Tweet. Staff writers. Related Posts. Ministry to married couples must change to save marriage, author urges 11 November Next Post. Popular News. Latest News. The Catechism explains that scandal is greater according to the authority of the one scandalizing. Because of the authority of the episcopate, the bishop can influence more people more effectively, increasing the gravity of the harm done to those who hear him.

If the faithful or unfaithful believe him, they move away from Jesus Christ and the salvation he offers us. This example displays a second, closely related element of scandal: it increases when the speaker has a duty to teach the truth. Since people trust their bishops to teach them the true Catholic faith, their errors are particularly harmful. This can cause a mistrust of the hierarchy and a disrespect for the priesthood. The Catechism names two more factors that can increase the gravity of scandal.

It becomes more grave when the scandalized person is especially weak or when others are deliberately led into grave sin. Given the poorly formed faith of so many Catholics, this means that today the opportunities for scandal are many. The improperly catechized can easily mistake vice for virtue and be led into sin. In cases where scandal occurs but is less grave, it may lead to a simple misunderstanding. In the graver cases described above, scandal can encourage a gravely improper view of reality, to the point that a person sees good as evil and evil as good.

In the most severe cases, as when a Catholic leader endorses a sinful lifestyle, someone could get the wrong idea about God, the Church, or salvation, causing him to run towards hell while thinking that he is closing in on heaven. This potential is amplified when the listeners are young and impressionable. We all have to guard against it, for it can take many forms, usually regardless of our intentions.